USPTO serial 77041396
DAVENPORT STUDIOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAVENPORT STUDIOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel R. Platt
Joel R. Platt BGE, LTD.9333 N MILWAUKEE AVENILES, IL 60714-1303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Spoons | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Art objects, namely, figures, figurines, sculptures and plaques made of cold cast resin, plastic or wood or of any combination of the foregoing; art objects based on architecture, namely, miniature buildings and miniature reproductions of architectural elements, made of cold cast resin; picture frames; ornaments of cold cast resin, bone, ivory, plaster, plastic, wax, wicker and wood, excluding Christmas tree ornaments; hampers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Small domestic utensils and containers not of precious metal, namely, soap dishes, soap dispensers, tumblers, toothbrush holders, towel bars, wastepaper baskets; canister sets, drinking glasses, ice buckets, cork screws, bottle openers, napkin rings, cookie jars, barware, namely, seltzer bottles, tea kettles, mugs, drinking steins, tankards, plates, cups, saucers, bowls, spice racks, sugar bowl and creamer sets, salt and pepper shakers, hand-operated pepper and spice grinders, trays, cake stands, serving platters, baskets of wicker and woven wood, candlesticks, candle holders, votive candle holders, vases, cachepots, coffee pots, teapots, pitchers; personal accessories, namely, cosmetic compacts, sold empty, perfume atomizers sold empty, hair brush and comb sets and shaving brush sets; glassware, porcelain ware and earthenware, namely, figurines, statues, bells, ornaments, decorative plates, collectors' plates, and wall art ornaments made of porcelain, china, ceramic and glass; plates made of resin, plastic or wood or of any combination of the foregoing; art objects based on architecture, namely, miniature buildings and miniature reproductions of architectural elements, made of porcelain or ceramic | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, namely, plush animals; dolls and doll accessories, toy model vehicles and Christmas tree ornaments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Edwin M. Knowles China Company
- Other trademarks owned by The Edwin M. Knowles China Company
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named DAVENPORT STUDIOS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 16, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |