Drawing for ÜBERZUIKER

USPTO serial 77041861

ÜBERZUIKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ÜBERZUIKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert A. Becker

ROBERT A BECKER FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic game programs and units of electronic game programs, namely, handheld units for playing electronic games for use with external display screen or monitorACTIVE—
028Games, namely, board and dice games; handheld units for playing electronic gamesACTIVE—
038Internet services, namely, electronic transmission of data in the nature of interactive electronic gamesACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, non-downloadable interactive games presented to mobile communications devices via a global computer network and wireless networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 10, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 8, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 16, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 29, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 17, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance