USPTO serial 77042023
RIDGID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 9, 2007
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with RIDGID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Newark, DE, US
Newark, DE, US
Newark, DE, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael P. Brennan; Lisa M. DuRoss
Michael P. Brennan; Lisa M. DuRoss Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.5445 Corporate Drive, Suite 200Troy, MI 48098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand-operated tools, namely, ball bearings knock-out sets and parts and accessories therefor; manually operated tools, namely, ball bearing drive bolts, ratchet wrenches, ratchet threaders, torque wrenches, pipe dies; manually operated tools for working with tubing, namely, benders for bending conduit and pipe, conduit sizing tools; hand tools, namely, pipe taps; manually operated cutters; namely, belt cutters, pipe cutters, tube facing cutters, tubing cutters and cutter wheels; manually operated plastic pipe cutters; hand tools, namely, soil pipe cutters, and cable cutters and blades and cutter wheels therefor; hand tools, namely, cable trimmers; hand tools, namely, screw, bolt, nipple and pipe extractors; hammers and sledgehammers; chisels, hatchets, pliers, nippers, shears, snips, screwdrivers, screwdriver bits; saws, namely, hack saws, hole saws, jab saws, universal saws, and compass saws and blades handles for dies and reamers, compass saw handles, hand saws and blades therefor; manually operated tools, namely, tube soldering clips for use in soldering tubes; wrenches, namely, pipe wrenches, monkey wrenches, compound leverage wrenches, chain pipe extractor wrenches, strap wrenches, hex wrenches, spud wrenches, basin and adjustable end wrenches; vices, namely, pipe vices, multi-purpose metal vises and support stands therefor; hand tools, namely, pipe reamers, pipe die heads, pipe threaders, bolt threaders, pipe roll groovers, pipe and tube benders, pipe and tube expanders, pipe threading dies and bits; hand operated knockout sets for punching holes in pipes, cable cutters; general purpose hand tools, namely, bench vices, anvils, levels, hammers, rulers, shovels, screw extractors, electrical wire cutting, stripping and crimping tools, punching dies, flaring tools, bolt cutters, cable trimmers, shovels, and spades; hand-powered drain and sewer cleaning equipment and parts and accessories therefor, namely, closet augers, hand spinners, grappler hooks and flat sewer tapes for unclogging the sewer; hand operated plumbing snakes, namely, drain snakes and drain cables; manually operated pipe deburring tools, namely, tools for removing burrs from pipes and tubing; manually operated pipe and tube flaring tools, namely, tools for flaring pipes and tubing; manually operated pipe and tube sizing tools, namely, tools for sizing pipes and tubing; metal pipe stands; manually operated tapping tools, namely, tools for forming pipe threads; manually operated tapping machines, namely, manual drills | ACTIVE | Jun 18, 1923 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 17, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 16, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |