USPTO serial 77042449
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
St. Louis, MO
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul W. Mussell
PAUL W MUSSELL DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 S 6TH ST STE 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1498UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, Games and Playthings, Namely, Dolls, Doll Clothing and Accessories For Dolls | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |