USPTO serial 77043795
NANO OPTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NANO OPTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter N. Jansson
PETER N JANSSON JANSSON SHUPE MUNGER & ANTARAMIAN LTD245 MAIN STRACINE, WI 53403-1034UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Electrical lighting fixtures using LEDs, namely, area lights, canopy lights, street lights, parking lot lights and walkway lights | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |