Drawing for INOV8

USPTO serial 77044232

INOV8

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARLSEN, EMILY K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INOV8?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard S. MacMillan

RICHARD S MACMILLAN MACMILLAN, SOBANSKI & TODD LLCONE MARITIME PLZ FIFTH FL720 WATER STTOLEDO, OH 43604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Sanitary preparations for medical purposes; dietetic foods adapted for medical use; food for babies; medical plasters; wound dressings; material for stopping teeth; dental wax; all purpose disinfectants; preparations for destroying vermin; immune response stimulants; vaccinesACTIVE—
007Component parts of engines other than for land vehicles, namely, fuel injectors and fuel injection modules; Component parts of diesel engines other than for land vehicles, namely, fuel injectors and fuel injection modulesACTIVE—
009Fuel cells; test benches; apparatus for fuel injection analysis, namely, metering units; fuel injector testersACTIVE—
010Suture materials; and medical needle-less syringesACTIVE—
011Hydroxyl radical generators for use in the disinfection of air and of surfaces either directly or indirectly, for the elimination of odors; water purifying apparatus for sewage treatment; water treatment equipment, namely, digesters for sewage treatment; apparatus for disinfecting air, namely, ozone sanitizers; apparatus for disinfecting natural or artificial surfaces, namely, ozone sanitizers; energy storage plant; biofuel production plant; ethanol production plantACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological consulting services in the field of automotive emissions and microbiology; industrial analysis and research services in the fields of automotive emissions and microbiology; design of computer hardware and software; engineering services; technical testing services in the fields of automotive emissions and microbiology; calibration of fuel systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 12, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 5, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 5, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 5, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 7, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Apr 7, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 21, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance