USPTO serial 77044232
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard S. MacMillan
RICHARD S MACMILLAN MACMILLAN, SOBANSKI & TODD LLCONE MARITIME PLZ FIFTH FL720 WATER STTOLEDO, OH 43604| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Sanitary preparations for medical purposes; dietetic foods adapted for medical use; food for babies; medical plasters; wound dressings; material for stopping teeth; dental wax; all purpose disinfectants; preparations for destroying vermin; immune response stimulants; vaccines | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Component parts of engines other than for land vehicles, namely, fuel injectors and fuel injection modules; Component parts of diesel engines other than for land vehicles, namely, fuel injectors and fuel injection modules | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Fuel cells; test benches; apparatus for fuel injection analysis, namely, metering units; fuel injector testers | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Suture materials; and medical needle-less syringes | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Hydroxyl radical generators for use in the disinfection of air and of surfaces either directly or indirectly, for the elimination of odors; water purifying apparatus for sewage treatment; water treatment equipment, namely, digesters for sewage treatment; apparatus for disinfecting air, namely, ozone sanitizers; apparatus for disinfecting natural or artificial surfaces, namely, ozone sanitizers; energy storage plant; biofuel production plant; ethanol production plant | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological consulting services in the field of automotive emissions and microbiology; industrial analysis and research services in the fields of automotive emissions and microbiology; design of computer hardware and software; engineering services; technical testing services in the fields of automotive emissions and microbiology; calibration of fuel systems | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |