USPTO serial 77044348
SUPERGOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPERGOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Marina Del Rey, CA
Marina Del Rey, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay H. Geller
2425 Olympic Bl., Suite 4000WSanta Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Anti-aging cream; anti-wrinkle cream; beauty creams; body cream; cosmetic creams; cosmetic creams for skin care; cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; cosmetic preparations for the care of mouth and teeth; face and body creams; face creams; hair care creams; hair care lotions; hair care preparations; hair cleaning preparations; hair conditioners; hair creams; hair emollients; hair fixers; hair lotions; hair nourishers; hair oils; hair pomades; hair rinses; hair shampoo; hair spray; hair styling gel; hair styling spray; hair tonics; medicated soap; mouthwash; mouthwashes; non-medicated bath preparations; non-medicated body soaks; non-medicated foot cream; non-medicated lip care preparations; non-medicated lip protector; non-medicated mouth rinse; non-medicated mouth wash and rinse; non-medicated mouthwash and gargle; non-medicated ointments for the prevention and treatment of sunburn; non-medicated skin care preparations; non-medicated skin creams; non-medicated stimulating lotions for the skin; oil baths for hair care; oils for hair conditioning; skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin serum; skin cleansers; skin cleansing lotion; skin conditioners; skin cream; skin creams in liquid and in solid form; skin lotion; skin moisturizer; skin texturizers; skin toners; tooth cleaning preparations; tooth gel; tooth paste; tooth polish; tooth whitening creams; tooth whitening gels; tooth whitening pastes; tooth whitening preparations; toothpaste; toothpastes | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Dietary and nutritional supplements; dietary food supplements; dietary supplements for human consumption; food supplements; food supplements, namely, anti-oxidants; herbal supplements; homeopathic supplements; medicated hair care preparations; medicated lip balm; medicated mouth care and treatment preparations; medicated mouthwash; medicated skin care preparations; medicinal creams for skin care; medicinal preparations for the mouth and as sprays; medicinal preparations for the mouth to be applied in the form of drops, capsules, tablets and compressed tablets; nutritional supplements; nutritional supplements in lotion form sold as a component of nutritional skin care products; pain relief medication; rubbing compound for medical and/or therapeutic use; vitamin and mineral preparations for use as ingredients in the food and pharmaceutical industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |