USPTO serial 77044410
BEAT SOCIETY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEAT SOCIETY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable musical sound recordings; Sound recordings featuring music; Video recordings featuring music | ACTIVE | Nov 3, 2003 |
| 035 | Advice in the field of business management and marketing; Business consulting, management, planning and supervision; Management of performing artists; Promoting the concerts of others | ACTIVE | Nov 3, 2003 |
| 041 | Concert booking; Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials; Entertainment services, namely, providing prerecorded music, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all on-line via a global computer network; Entertainment, namely, a continuing reality television show broadcast over television, satellite, audio, and video media; Music production services; Music publishing services; Presentation of live show performances; Presentation of musical performance; Production of sound and music video recordings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2011 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 26, 2010 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |