USPTO serial 77044525
ROC USA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 12, 2011
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ROC USA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian D. Thomas
Brian D. Thomas Sheehan Phinney Bass & Green1000 Elm Street, 17th FloorManchester, NH 03101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing business management consulting in the field of manufactured home communities; business management assistance; business management consulting; business management organization; professional business consulting; business information; business expertise; manufactured housing community management assistance; market studies; market research; [ economic forecasts; ] cost price analysis; promotion of partnerships between resident owned communities and community organizers, trainers, primary lenders, and sub debt lenders for lending in manufactured housing communities; advertising; issuing and updating of advertising texts for others | ACTIVE | Sep 11, 2006 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, teaching in the field of resident ownership of manufactured housing communities and lending practices; training seminars for community development practitioners, lenders, and homeowners | ACTIVE | Sep 11, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROC USA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ROC USA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by New Hampshire Community Loan Fund, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ROC USA, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ROC USA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 3, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 3, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 17, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |