Drawing for DNAVAX

USPTO serial 77044560

DNAVAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LITZAU, MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DNAVAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn M. Wheble

Kathryn M. Wheble K&L Gates LLPFour Embarcadero CenterSuite 1200San Francisco, CA 94111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Medical and scientific research in the field of synthetic gene delivery systems; development and testing of products for gene delivery; licensing of intellectual property rights in the field of gene delivery; provision of technical know-how, namely consultation and technical advice in the field of formulations for gene deliveryACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 13, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 17, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Dec 9, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 27, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 22, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 27, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 27, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 27, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Mar 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 21, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance