USPTO serial 77044834
R.G. GRIFFITH A COMPANY OF AMERICAN INFRASTRUCTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4215791Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 2, 2012
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with R.G. GRIFFITH A COMPANY OF AMERICAN INFRASTRUCTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy D. Pecsenye
TIMOTHY D PECSENYE BLANK ROME LLPONE LOGAN SQUARE9TH FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Construction consultation; construction management; construction planning; consultation services for the construction of water and waste water plants; construction of water and waste water plants; laying and construction of pipelines; road and highway construction; road and highway paving services; bridge construction | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by American Infrastructure, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American Infrastructure, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American Infrastructure, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named R.G. GRIFFITH A COMPANY OF AMERICAN INFRASTRUCTURE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |