USPTO serial 77044838
ROCK CREEK CATTLE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3724129Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 15, 2009
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROCK CREEK CATTLE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rock Creek Cattle Company, Ltd.
Jacksonville, FL
Rock Creek Cattle Company, Ltd.
Jacksonville, FL
Rock Creek Cattle Company, Ltd.
Jacksonville, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles K. Smith
CHARLES K. SMITH POORE ROTH AND ROBINSON, P.C.1341 HARRISON AVEBUTTE, MT 59702UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | real estate development services, namely, development of a private luxury resort property | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rock Creek Cattle Company, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Rock Creek Cattle Company, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Rock Creek Cattle Company, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named ROCK CREEK CATTLE COMPANY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |