USPTO serial 77044926
CONSUME THIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONSUME THIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEIL A. BURSTEIN
NEIL A. BURSTEIN Law Offices of Neil Burstein63 Winterberry CircleCross River, NY 10518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing information on the subject of ranking and review of environmental and socially responsible ratings of consumer products of others in the fields of paints, varnishes and dyes, cosmetics, perfumes, soaps, cleaners and bleaches, electronic goods, computers and televisions, pharmaceuticals, jewelry, paper goods and printed matters, leather goods, furniture, housewares, glassware, portable plastic contains for storing household and kitchen goods, yarns and threads, fabric and textile articles, clothing and footwear, toys and sporting goods, meats, processed foods, coffee, cereals, bakery goods, soft drinks, beer and mineral water, wines, spirits and liqueurs; providing a website featuring environmental and socially responsible rating of consumer products of others in the fields of paints, varnishes and dyes, cosmetics, perfumes, soaps, cleaners and bleaches, electronic goods, computers and televisions, pharmaceuticals, jewelry, paper goods and printed matters, leather goods, furniture, housewares, glassware, yarns and threads, fabric and textile articles, clothing and footwear, toys and sporting goods, meats, processed foods, coffee, cereals, bakery goods, soft drinks, beer and mineral water, wines, spirits and liqueurs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |