USPTO serial 77044945
YES TO CARROTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YES TO CARROTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tel Aviv, IL
Tel Aviv, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Crittenden
John W. Crittenden Cooley LLP777 6th Street, NW, Suite 1100Washington, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Cosmetic creams; non-medicated skin care preparations; skin moisturizers; face creams; skin creams; skin nourishing creams; facial scrubbing preparations; facial masks; night creams; eye creams; hair care preparations; all the aforementioned goods including carrots, carrot juice, carrot extracts, carrot seed extracts, and/or ingredients otherwise derived from carrots or carrot seeds (Based on Intent to Use) Cosmetics; make-up; make-up removing preparations; cosmetic preparations for body care; skin and facial cleansing preparations; eye care preparations for cosmetic purposes; perfumery; dentifrices; soaps; essential oils; anti-aging skin masks; skin care cleansing preparations, namely, facial mud peels; body moisturizing lotions, creams and gels; body scrubbing preparations; shower gels; non-medicated bath preparations; nail care preparations; body sprays; hair and scalp mud masks; hand and elbow moisturizing creams; body butters; all the aforementioned goods including carrots, carrot juice, carrot extracts, carrot seed extracts, and/or ingredients otherwise derived from carrots or carrot seeds (Based on 44(e)) Soaps; perfumery; essential oils; cosmetics; hair lotions; dentifrices; skin, body, eye and hair care preparations, for cosmetic purposes; non-medicated bath preparations; creams, lotions and gels for cosmetic purposes; skin and facial cleansing preparations for personal use; cosmetic preparations containing vegetable extracts or fruit extracts or a combination thereof for face, skin, body and hair care; cosmetic preparations containing vitamins extracts or mineral extracts or a combination thereof for face, skin, body and hair care; cosmetic preparations containing minerals, muds or salts or a combination thereof for face, skin, body and hair care; hair lotions containing vegetable extracts or fruit extracts or a combination thereof; hair lotions containing vitamins extracts or mineral extracts or a combination thereof; hair lotions containing minerals, muds or salts or a combination thereof; make up preparations; makeup removing preparations; vegetable based oils or fruit based oils or a combination thereof for use on the skin, for cosmetic purposes; all the aforementioned goods including carrots, carrot juice, carrot extracts, carrot seed extracts, and/or ingredients otherwise derived from carrots or carrot seeds | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 7, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 31, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |