Drawing for THE CITY

USPTO serial 77045135

THE CITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAMPTON, CHARISMA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE CITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryan D. Adams

MICHAEL A ADLER DAVIDOFF MALITO & HUTCHER LLP200 GARDEN CITY PLAZASUITE 315GARDEN CITY, NY 11530

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Installation, maintenance and repair of computer hardware and consumer electronics in the field of multimedia, data communications, computing, security systems, home automation, automotive electronics, and appliancesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 29, 2011TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Mar 29, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 29, 2011OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 15, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 3, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 27, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 18, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 29, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 12, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2006GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Nov 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance