Drawing for BREVILLE

USPTO serial 77045283

BREVILLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BREVILLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janice Bader

Janice Bader Symbus Law Group, LLCP.O. Box 933Culpeper, VA 22701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Cutlery, hand tools, cutting tools and implements for kitchen use, hand tools for food preparation, choppers and cleavers in this class; tableware in this class; dinnerware in this class; serveware in this class; knife steels; ladles; parts and accessories in this class for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
021Non-electric mixers; kitchen containers; crockery, cutting boards; kitchen utensils; kitchen tools and implements in this class (hand operated), saucepans and frying pans, bakeware, cookware, ovenware, salt and pepper sets, cups and saucers, non-electric kettles, tea pots, water jugs in this class, canisters, storage containers, plates and bowls; bread boards; butter dishes; ceramics for household purposes; coffee and tea preparation equipment, coffeepots; crockery; cutting boards for the kitchen; dishes (not of precious metal); flasks (not of precious metal); juicers (non-electric) kettles (non-electric); food serving utensils, containers implements and accessories; saucers (not of precious metal); trays for domestic purposes (not of precious metal); glassware, porcelain and earthenware not included in other classes; parts and accessories in this class for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 9, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance