USPTO serial 77045307
RUGGEDWAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RUGGEDWAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodbridge, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Filip A. Kowalewski
Filip A. Kowalewski Siemens Industry, Inc.3333 Old Milton ParkwayAlpharetta, GA 30005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer software for operating and/or managing computer networks consisting of one or more of Ethernet switches, routers, and/or serial devices forming a network; computer software for monitoring the performance and the physical structure of a computer network; computer software for managing and visualizing the performance of a computer network; computer software, namely, an embedded operating system for computers, managed Ethernet switches, routers and/or serial devices servers forming a network; computer software, namely, an operating system for computers, managed Ethernet switches routers and/or serial device servers connected to a network; computer network communication routers, Ethernet switches, gateway routers for use with communication networks, computers and modems;fiber optic cables, connectors and filters; fiber optical network and components therefor; fiber optical Ethernet networks and components therefor; fiber optical networks comprised of hubs, switches and fiber-to-electrical media converters, communication hubs, communication routers and switches having mixed fiber optical and electrical media ports; computer network hubs, switches and routers having fiber optical ports; computer hubs, routers and switches having mixed fiber optical and electrical media ports; fiber optical Ethernet networks comprised of hubs,switches, fiber-to-electrical media converters, serial to Ethernet servers, communication hubs, communication routers, computer hubs, computer network routers, switches and serial to Ethernet servers having mixed fiber optic to electrical media ports, and components therefor; computer network hubs, switches and routers having optical ports and components therefor; computer hubs, routers, switches, serial to Ethernet servers and serial device servers having mixed fiber optic and copper ports; video encoders; fiber optic to cable converters; fiber optical to electrical media converters; serial to Ethernet gateways; serial device servers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |