USPTO serial 77045328
RUGGEDIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RUGGEDIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodbridge, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Filip A. Kowalewski
Filip A. Kowalewski Siemens Industry, Inc.3333 Old Milton ParkwayAlpharetta, GA 30005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer software for operating and/or managing computer networks, Ethernet switches, routers, and/or serial devices forming a network; computer software for operating and/or managing communication networks and networking infrastructure; computer software for detecting and recovering from a fault in a communication network; computer software for detecting and recovering from a fault in the communications network, and, monitoring and diagnosing network infrastructure; computer software for monitoring the performance and the physical structure of a communications network or a computer network; computer software for managing and visualizing the performance of a computer network; computer software, namely, an embedded operating system for computers, managed Ethernet switches, routers and/or serial device servers forming a network; computer software, namely, an operating system for computers, managed Ethernet switches, routers and/or serial device servers connected to a network; computer network communication routers; switches, namely, computer switches and Ethernet switches; gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware; computers and modems; fiber optic cables, connectors and filters; fiber optical networks composed of hubs, switches, routers, computer hardware, computer adaptors, and/or network bridges and parts therefor; fiber optical Ethernet networks composed of hubs, switches, routers, computer hardware, computer adaptors, and/or network bridges and parts therefor; fiber optical networks comprised of hubs, switches and fiber-to-copper media converters, communication hubs, communication routers and switches having mixed fiber optical and electrical media ports; computer network hubs, switches and routers having fiber optical ports; computer hubs, routers and switches having mixed fiber optical and electrical media ports; fiber optical Ethernet networks comprised of hubs, switches, fiber-to-copper media converters, serial interface to Ethernet servers, communication hubs, communication routers, computer hubs, computer network routers, switches and serial interface to Ethernet servers having mixed fiber optic to electrical media ports, and parts therefore; computer network hubs, switches and routers having optical ports and parts therefore; computer hubs, routers, switches, serial interface to Ethernet servers and serial device servers having mixed fiber optic and copper ports; video encoders; fiber optic to cable converters; fiber optical to electrical media converters; serial to Ethernet gateways; serial device servers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Communication network management, namely, remote management of telecommunication networks for others for others; communication network management, namely, managing telecommunications networks for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical support, namely, monitoring of network systems; computer network diagnostic services; communication network diagnostic services; diagnostic services in the field of computer networks; diagnostic services in the field of communication network systems, computer network design for others; computer network consulting services; computer networking management, namely, remote management of computer applications for others; computer network management, namely, managing computer networks for others; communication network consulting services relating to hardware and software for computer communication networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |