USPTO serial 77045695
TUFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TUFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hamilton Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Faber
ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASFL 7NEW YORK, NY 10036-8401Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Railway cars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 5, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |