USPTO serial 77045735
TRANSVERSE ULTRA FAST-FLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRANSVERSE ULTRA FAST-FLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hamilton Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Faber
ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN LLP7TH FL1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Railway cars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |