USPTO serial 77046089
ANVIL FENCE & ACCESS SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANVIL FENCE & ACCESS SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Lippman
ROBERT LIPPMAN LEMERY GRIESLER LLC60 RAILROAD PLSARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866-3048UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Anvil Fence & Supply Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Anvil Fence & Supply Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named ANVIL FENCE & ACCESS SYSTEMS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2008 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| May 29, 2008 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |