USPTO serial 77046135
MADE IN NAPA VALLEY JANE!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MADE IN NAPA VALLEY JANE!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURIE H VAN LÖBEN SELS
Laurie H. van Loben Sels Duane Morris LLPOne Market Plaza, Suite 2200San Francisco, CA 94105-1127UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TULOCAY & COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Tulocay & Company Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Tulocay & Company Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named MADE IN NAPA VALLEY JANE!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |