Drawing for BEAT DEBT

USPTO serial 77046296

BEAT DEBT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEAT DEBT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles L. Warner

Charles L. Warner Powell Goldstein LLPFourteenth Floor1201 W. Peachtree St., NWATLANTA, GA 30309-3488

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game cartridges; Computer game cassettes; Computer game discs; Computer game equipment containing memory devices namely, discs; Computer game programs; Computer game software; Computer game tapes; Computer programs for pre-recorded games; Computerized video table games for gaming purposes; Electronic game programs; Electronic game software for cellular telephones; Electronic game software for handheld electronic devices; Electronic game software for wireless devices; Game software; Gaming machines; Interactive audio game discs containing financial management game; Interactive multimedia computer game program; Interactive multimedia computer program for financial management; Interactive video game programs; Interactive video games of virtual reality comprised of computer hardware and softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 19, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
May 19, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 16, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 15, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 15, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 14, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 14, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 7, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2008IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
May 6, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2008INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Mar 12, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 11, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 11, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 19, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance