USPTO serial 77046953
SEXTUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEXTUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Sebolt
JOSEPH A SEBOLT SAND & SEBOLTAEGIS TWR STE 11004940 MUNSON ST N WCANTON, OH 44718-3615Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF IMAGES AND PHOTOGRAPHS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ONLINE ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A WEBSITE IN THE FIELD OF ADULT ENTERTAINMENT; PROVIDING LINKS TO THE WEBSITES OF OTHERS FEATURING ADULT ENTERTAINMENT-RELATED PICTURES, VIDEO CLIPS AND OTHER INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF ADULT ENTERTAINMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |