USPTO serial 77047827
LEUCOMODULIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEUCOMODULIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Seiter
William J. Seiter SEITER & CO.220 26th Street, Suite 202SANTA MONICA, CA 90402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement; nutritional and dietary supplements; functional foods and functional food additives, namely, dietary fiber, processed rice bran, enzymatically modified rice bran and derivatives thereof, fermented soybean extracts, and dried purified filtrate of bacillus subtillis natto culture for use as food supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 8, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |