USPTO serial 77048697
AESLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AESLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANN LAMPORT HAMMITTE
ANN LAMPORT HAMMITTE LOWRIE LANDO & ANASTASI LLPRIVERFRONT OFFICE PARKONE MAIN STREET ELEVENTH FLOORCAMBRIDGE, MA 02142Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL APPARATUS, NAMELY, RADAR SYSTEMS, PHASED ARRAY ANTENNAS AND ELECTRONICALLY SCANNED LENS ARRAY ANTENNAS; PHASE SHIFTER ASSEMBLIES COMPRISED OF PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FOR MICROWAVE FREQUENCIES, ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS, NAMELY, DIODES, RESISTORS AND CAPACITORS, ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS FOR SIGNALS AND POWER, AND A METAL PACKAGE, NAMELY, A METAL BOX FOR ENCLOSING ALL COMPONENTS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING A UNIQUE PHASE CHANGE OF A RADIO FREQUENCY SIGNAL SUCH THAT THE MULTIPLICITY OF SIGNALS FROM SEVERAL OUTPUTS ARE COMBINED, THEREBY FOCUSING THE ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATED COMPOSITE SIGNAL IN A PREDETERMINED DIRECTION IN FRONT OF AN ANTENNA CONTAINING THE PHASE SHIFTERS; INTEGRATED CIRCUIT MODULES FOR RADAR TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS FOR AMPLIFYING RADIO FREQUENCY ENERGY FOR THE PURPOSES OF TRANSMITTING RADIO FREQUENCY ENERGY AND FOR OBTAINING RECEIVED RADIO FREQUENCY SIGNALS FOR PROCESSING; AND RADIATING ELEMENTS, NAMELY, ANTENNAS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |