USPTO serial 77049015
CLARISURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SERVANCE, RENEE L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLARISURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Davis
David J. Davis Baker & McKenzie LLP130 E Randolph StreetSuite 3500Chicago, IL 60601-6314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Diagnostic reagents, assays and kits for clinical and medical laboratory use, namely, for detecting genetic disorders and for detecting hematological/oncological disorders; diagnostic reagents and assays for the treatment, monitoring and diagnosis of mental retardation and hematological/oncology disorders; diagnostic kits consisting primarily of diagnostic assays, specimen holders, diagnostic preparation agents, and specimen preparation agents for use in diagnosing, treating and monitoring of genetic disorders and hematological/oncological disorders; diagnostic kits consisting primarily of diagnostic assays, specimen holders, diagnostic preparation agents, and specimen preparation agents for genetic disorders and hematological/oncological disorder testing | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |