USPTO serial 77049018
TRAVOO.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRAVOO.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Road Town, Tortola, VG
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Communications by computer terminals; computer aided transmission of messages and images; electronic bulletin board services for the transmission of messages among computer users concerning travelling, sightseeing, touring and the tourist industry; electronic mail; rental of telecommunications equipment, namely, computer terminals for telecommunication | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2013 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |