USPTO serial 77049126
BLACK FLEECE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLACK FLEECE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
STEPHEN L. BAKER BAKER AND RANNELLS PA575 ROUTE 28SUITE 102RARITAN, NJ 08869Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Belts; Blouses; Boots; Bottoms; Coats; Dresses; Evening dresses; Gloves; Hats; Hosiery; Jackets; Men's suits, Women's suits; Mufflers; Neckties; Pants; Rainwear; Scarves; Shirts; Shoes; Shorts; Skirts; Socks; Suits; Suspenders; Sweaters; Ties; Tops; Trousers; and Vests not made of fleece fabric | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2012 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |