Drawing for SIRIUS PRODUCTS

USPTO serial 77049192

SIRIUS PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIRIUS PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD C. LITMAN

RICHARD C LITMAN CRYSTAL CITY STATIONLITMAN LAW OFFICES LTDPO BOX 15035ARLINGTON, VA 22215

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008ForksACTIVE—
009Acoustic meters; Avalanche probes, namely, elongated rods used to manually probe for people or objects covered by an avalanche; Centrifugal metering pumps; Concentration meters; Electric meters; Electrical energy utilization metering devices complete with related software; Electronic metering faucets; Electronic testing equipment, namely, sound level meters; Electrotechnical vibration meters; Exposure meters for photographic devices; Frequency meters; Gas meters; Medical imaging software that records, monitors and analyzes data using a catheter based ultrasound imaging probe; Photographic exposure meters; Probes for testing integrated circuits; Scientific measuring instruments, namely, conductivity meters; Sound level meters; Vibration meters; Water metersACTIVE—
010Adult sexual aids, namely, dildos, butt plugs, and any object that might be used as a probeACTIVE—
021Swizzle sticksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 13, 2007PBIRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST—
Oct 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance