Drawing for G

USPTO serial 77049447

G

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with G?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott W. Johnston

Scott W. Johnston MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for use in point-of-sale transactions and for processing such transactions; Computer system for processing point-of-sale transactions comprised of a machine readable magnetically-encoded card, bar-coded card, machine readable magnetically-encoded and bar-coded card, a magnetically-encoded card reader, a bar code reader and computer software; Magnetically-encoded cards bearing machine-readable information used to securely access personal information including identification, information for use in emergencies, medical information, insurance policy details, names and contact details; Computer hardware and software used to access a data repository of personal information including identification, information for use in emergencies, medical information, insurance policy details, names and contact detailsACTIVE—
036Financial services, namely, Internet-based consumer credit lending services, electronic credit transactions, point-of-sale transaction services, transaction authorization and settlement services, electronic payment processing services, credit transaction verification, payment transaction authentication and verification services, providing financial information via a global computer network, credit card services; advisory services regarding all of the foregoing servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 17, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 10, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 17, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 3, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 25, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 19, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 19, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 22, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 28, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 30, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 23, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 11, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 25, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2006MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance