Drawing for YOU WILL NOTICE THE DIFFERENCE

USPTO serial 77049491

YOU WILL NOTICE THE DIFFERENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YOU WILL NOTICE THE DIFFERENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith E. Sharkin

Keith E. Sharkin Dickstein Shapiro LLP1633 BroadwayNew York, NY 10019-6708UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Educational books relating to business management; printed informational materials in the form of brochures relating to business management; pamphlets relating to business management; catalogs for use in the field of business management; seminar program materials, namely course outlines and notebooks containing instructional programs, question and answer sheets and factual material for use as teaching devices all for use in the field of business managementACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, providing on-line courses in the field of business management via the Internet; education services, namely conducting seminars in the field of business management; organizing exhibitions for educational purposes in the field of business managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 3, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 11, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 11, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 9, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 5, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 11, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 10, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 19, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance