USPTO serial 77049980
FARMHOUSE PANTRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FARMHOUSE PANTRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tarpon Springs, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Blended oil; Broth; Bruschetta toppings; Canned, cooked or otherwise processed tomatoes; Condiments namely, pepper oil; Cooking oil; Cranberry sauce; Dehydrated fruit snacks; Dips; Dried fruit mixes; Dried fruits; Edible oil; Egg nog mixes; Extracts for soups; Food glazing preparations comprised primarily of fruit and/or fruit pectic for use in cooking and baking; Fruit conserves; Fruit preserves; Fruit topping; Fruit-based filling for cakes and pies; Fruit-based snack food; Fruit-based spreads; Instant or pre-cooked miso soup; Instant or pre-cooked soup; Jams; Jellies; Matzo ball soup; Olive oil; Preparations for making soups; Preserved vegetables (in oil); Salad oil; Snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; Soup mixes; Soups; Tapenades | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2006 |
| 030 | Artichoke sauce; Baking spices; Barbecue sauce; Bread mixes; Cake mixes; Chili sauce; Chocolate topping; Chutney; Cocoa mixes; Condiment, namely pepper sauce; Cookie mixes; Curry; Dipping sauces; Dried pasta; Dry seasoning mixes for soups; Flavoured vinegar; Flavourings for soups; Frosting mixes; Fruit couli; Fruit jellies; Fruit sauces excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce; Gravy mixes; Honey; Hot sauce; Ice cream mixes; Icing mixes; Instant doughnut mixes; Instant pancake mixes; Instant pudding mixes; Marinades; Mix for making combined noodle and sauce dish; Mixes for bakery goods; Mixes for making matzo balls; Muffin mixes; Mustard; Noodles and sauce mixes combined in unitary packages; Noodles and seasoning mixes combined in unitary packages; Pancake mixes; Pasta for soups; Pizza sauce; Ready-made sauces; Rice and seasoning mix combined in unitary packages; Salad dressings; Salad sauces; Salsa; Sauce mixes; Sauces; Sauces for barbecued meat; Sherbet mixes; Sloppy Joe seasoning mix; Snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn; Spaghetti sauce; Spice blends; Stuffing mixes containing bread; Table salt mixed with sesame seeds; Teriyaki sauce; Tomato sauce; Vinegar; Wine vinegar | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |