USPTO serial 77050411
I CAN'T BELIEVE IT'S NOT TWICE THE PRICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3438851Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 3, 2008
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with I CAN'T BELIEVE IT'S NOT TWICE THE PRICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Halstead CO9, GB
Halstead CO9, GB
Halstead CO9, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | Back-hairpieces fixing pins for Japanese hair styling (tabodome); Back-hairpieces for Japanese hair styling (tabomino); Barrettes; Brooches; Chignons for Japanese hair styling (mage); Clam clips for hair; False hair for Japanese hair styling (kamoji); Hair accessories, namely, claw clips; Hair accessories, namely, jaw clips; Hair accessories, namely, snap clips; Hair accessories, namely, twisters; Hair bands; Hair bows; Hair buckles; Hair clips; Hair curl clips; Hair curlers; Hair extensions; Hair frosting caps; Hair nets; Hair ornaments; Hair ornaments in the form of combs; Hair ornaments in the nature of hair wraps; Hair pieces; Hair pins; Hair pins and grips; Hair ribbons; Hair ribbons for Japanese hair styling (tegara); Hair scrunchies; Non-electric hair curlers; Non-electric hair rollers; Oriental hair pins; Ornamental hair pins for Japanese hair styling (kogai); Wigs, hairpieces, and add-in and add-on hair accessories constructed primarily of synthetic and/or human hair | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 7, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |