USPTO serial 77050892
CHOICE STEROL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHOICE STEROL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robyn S. Lederman
Robyn S. Lederman CANTOR COLBURN LLP201 W. Big Beaver Road, Suite 1101Troy, MI 48084UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutraceutical supplements and dietary supplements; Nutraceuticals for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases; cholesterol lowering agents; cholesterol lowering agents incorporated into food products and beverages; phytosterol supplement composition incorporated in foods, nutraceuticals and dietary supplements; dietetic substances adapted for medical use, namely, mineral and/or vitamin preparations; vitamins and mineral supplements; softgel capsules, hard shell capsules, tablets, elixirs, syrups, premixes, comprising sterols, for use in food manufacture; food for babies, namely, milk formula | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; fruits, vegetables and meat mixes; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, eggs, milk and milk products, namely, cheese; yogurt; potato crisps; edible oils and fats; edible oil-based products, namely, spreads and margarines; drinking yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago; spices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard, vinegar; sauces, namely, ketchup, salsa, seafood sauce, tomato, BBQ sauce, soy sauce, meat sauce, pasta sauce, hot pepper sauce; flour made from cereals, namely, wheat, maize, rice; breads including rye bread; pastries; confectionary ices, namely, fruit ices, flavored ices, sorbets, sherbet and frozen juice bars; breakfast cereals; ready to eat cereal derived food bars; granola based snack bars; loose granola; cookies, petit-beurre biscuits, biscuits, crackers; chocolates; confections and chews, namely, candy, nut-based confections, coffee-based confections, chocolate-based confections, frozen confections, fruit-based confections, sugar-based confections, syrup-based confections, yogurt-based confections, licorice-based confections, cream-based confections, marshmallow-based confections, dairy-based confections, nougat-based confections, marzipan-based confections, gelatin-based confections, honey-based confections, ginger-based confections, molasses-based confections, mint-based confections, soy-based confections, egg-based confections, vegetable-based confections, seed-based confections, gum-based confections; coffee, artificial coffee, tea; fruit sauces excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce; ice milk | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | soft drinks; juices, namely, fruit and vegetable juices; smoothies; non-alcoholic cocktail mixes in powder form and sachets; mineral and aerated waters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Forbes Medi-Tech Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named CHOICE STEROL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |