Drawing for Y & CO.

USPTO serial 77051047

Y & CO.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Y & CO.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beth M. Goldman

BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2806UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Shoes, swimming suits, t-shirts, gloves, socks, caps, braces for clothing, leather belts, sandals, children's pants, infants' wear, uniforms for sports, brassieres, underclothing, underpants, undershirts, nightgownsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 18, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 29, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 6, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2008CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 29, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 3, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 2, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 27, 2007ISERWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Oct 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 10, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance