USPTO serial 77051068
LEGACY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEGACY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Sever, Jr.
MARK J SEVER JR ARCHER & GREINER PCPO BOX 3000HADDONFIELD, NJ 08033-0968UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | treadmills | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |