Drawing for METRO TOWER

USPTO serial 77051221

METRO TOWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with METRO TOWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arthur J. Greenbaum

ARTHUR J GREENBAUM COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037REAL ESTATE SERVICES, NAMELY, DEVELOPMENT OF A HIGH RISE OFFICE COMPLEX FOR THE BUILDING KNOWN AS METRO TOWER, LOCATED AT STAMFORD TRANSPORTATION CENTER IN STATION PLACE, STAMFORD, CONNECTICUTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 8, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 25, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 25, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 24, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 24, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 26, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 1, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 1, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 1, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 30, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 26, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 2, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 21, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance