Drawing for DOROTHY DRAPER & COMPANY, INC.

USPTO serial 77051972

DOROTHY DRAPER & COMPANY, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOROTHY DRAPER & COMPANY, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rosanne T. Yang

ROSANNE T YANG BAKER & HOSTETLER LLPCAPITOL SQ STE 210065 E STATE STCOLUMBUS, OH 43125

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004CandlesACTIVE—
008Tableware, namely, forks, knives and spoonsACTIVE—
011Chandeliers; Lamp shades; Sconce lighting fixtures; Upright and tablelampsACTIVE—
021Beverage glassware; Candlesticks not of precious metal; Coasters not of paper and not being table linen; Dishes and plates; Epergnes; Flower vases and bowls; Napkin rings not of precious metals; Plastic cups; Salt and pepper shakers; Serving trays not of precious metal; StemwareACTIVE—
024Bed blankets; Bed sheets; Bed spreads; Drapery; Duvet covers; Pillow cases; Pillow shams; Table linen, namely napkins, place mats, tableclothsACTIVE—
026Artificial flower arrangementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 17, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 21, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 5, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance