USPTO serial 77053123
THE TALK CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4030218Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 27, 2011
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE TALK CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, CA
MONTREAL, CA
MONTREAL, CA
MONTREAL, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marie Laure Leclercq
MARIE LAURE LECLERCQ DE GRANDPRE CHAIT1000, DE LA GAUCHETIERE WESTSUITE 2900MONTREAL,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Audio and video broadcasting, namely, musical and cultural broadcasting services on Internet; broadcast communication services, namely, broadcasting and recording services of voice messages on the Internet; electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of voice messages on the Internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Atelka Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by AHEEVA TECHNOLOGY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AHEEVA TECHNOLOGY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AHEEVA TECHNOLOGY INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named THE TALK CITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 2, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |