USPTO serial 77053263
ALIMASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- โ
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALIMASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mitsubishi Materials Kobe Tools Corporation
Akashi, Hyogo 674-007, JP
Other trademarks owned by Mitsubishi Materials Kobe Tools Corporation
Mitsubishi Materials Kobe Tools Corporation
Akashi, Hyogo 674-007, JP
Other trademarks owned by Mitsubishi Materials Kobe Tools Corporation
MITSUBISHI MATERIALS CORPORATION
TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Ehrlich
DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machine tools for cutting metal, namely drills, end mills, and milling cutters | ACTIVE | โ |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mitsubishi Materials Kobe Tools Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Mitsubishi Materials Kobe Tools Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by MITSUBISHI MATERIALS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named ALIMASTER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | โ |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | โ |
| Apr 12, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | โ |
| Apr 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | โ |
| Nov 5, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | โ |
| Oct 20, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | โ |
| Oct 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | โ |
| Apr 16, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | โ |
| Apr 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | โ |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | โ |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | โ |
| Apr 14, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | โ |
| Apr 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | โ |
| Oct 23, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | โ |
| Jun 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | โ |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | โ |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Dec 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |