USPTO serial 77053370
LONDON GOURMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4412570Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 8, 2013
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LONDON GOURMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Uhlir
JAMES R UHLIR CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS PLLC1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600SEATTLE, WA 98101-3029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Nuts, including roasted peanuts, salt and unsalted; BBQ peanuts; cashews; sunflower seeds (salted, unsalted or roasted); pistachios; mixed nuts, namely, a combination of roasted peanuts, BBQ peanuts, cashews, sunflower seeds, and/or pistachios | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Corn and rice based snack foods; candy; coffee | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by London Drugs Limited
- Other trademarks owned by London Drugs Limited
- Other trademarks owned by London Drugs Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named LONDON GOURMET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 8, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 23, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 10, 2013 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 23, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |