Drawing for BARNDOMINIUM

USPTO serial 77053865

BARNDOMINIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3589264Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 10, 2009
Examiner
LAVACHE, ROBERT JAMES
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BARNDOMINIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rodney A. Chamness

ICON BUILDING SYSTEMS9364 CR 628BRAZORIA, TX 77422UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035On-line retail store services featuring metal buildingsSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDFeb 13, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2014C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Nov 17, 2014CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 31, 2014CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
May 17, 2014PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 10, 2009R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Feb 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2009CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2008IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Mar 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2008AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 15, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 14, 2008EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 23, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 23, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 5, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance