Drawing for KISSTICK

USPTO serial 77054818

KISSTICK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KISSTICK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL F. ZENDEL

DANIEL F ZENDEL LADAS & PARRY LLP26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023-7604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Chocolates, biscuits, cookies, crackers, confectionery, wafers, corn chips, bread, pastries, cakes, pies, puddings, sherbets, ice creams, candy, caramels, chewing gumACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 30, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 29, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 5, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance