Drawing for MONSTER

USPTO serial 77055042

MONSTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONSTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric H. Melzer, Esq.

ERIC H. MELZER GREENBAUM, ROWE, SMITH & DAVIS LLPPO Box 5600Woodbridge, NJ 07095UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment Services, namely, a glow in the dark miniature golf course, video game arcade, redemption game arcade, namely, an amusement arcade featuring games that dispense tickets which may be redeemed for prizes and conducting birthday partiesACTIVEMar 17, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 19, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 19, 2009ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Apr 14, 2009CRTPREG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY—
Mar 18, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 6, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2009C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Mar 6, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 26, 2009RCIIREQUEST TO CANCEL INADVERTENTLY ISSUED REGISTRATION RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2009TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jan 16, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 16, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 20, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 28, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 5, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance