USPTO serial 77055551
APOTHECARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APOTHECARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Carpinteria, CA
Carpinteria, CA
Carpinteria, CA
Carpinteria, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven C. Sereboff
Steven C. Sereboff SoCal IP Law Group LLP310 N. Westlake Blvd. Suite 120Westlake Village, CA 91362UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MAGNETICALLY ENCODED DISCOUNT PRESCRIPTION DRUG CARDS; COUPONS DOWNLOADED FROM A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | CARDS IN THE NATURE OF IDENTIFICATION CARDS AND MEDICAL IDENTIFICATION CARDS, NOT MAGNETICALLY ENCODED; PRINTED CARDS IN THE NATURE OF MEDICAL IDENTIFICATION CARDS NOT MAGNETICALLY ENCODED; DISCOUNT PRESCRIPTION DRUG CARDS, NOT MAGNETICALLY ENCODED; DISCOUNT PRESCRIPTION DRUG CARDS FOR PROVIDING DISCOUNT PRESCRIPTIONS AT LOCAL PHARMACIES AND FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUG PLANS, NOT MAGNETICALLY ENCODED; DISCOUNT PRESCRIPTION DRUG CARDS FOR PROVIDING DISCOUNT FOR PRESCRIPTIONS AND NON-PRESCRIPTION DRUGS, NOT MAGNETICALLY ENCODED; COUPONS; PRINTED COUPONS; PRINTED COUPONS FOR PROVIDING DISCOUNTS; PRINTED COUPONS FOR PROVIDING DISCOUNTS AT LOCAL PHARMACIES; REBATE COUPONS; MANUFACTURER'S REBATE COUPONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ADMINISTRATION OF A DISCOUNT PROGRAM FOR ENABLING PARTICIPANTS TO OBTAIN DISCOUNTS ON GOODS AND SERVICES THROUGH THE USE OF A DISCOUNT PRESCRIPTION CARD; ADMINISTRATION OF A DISCOUNT PRESCRIPTION DRUG CARD PROGRAM ENABLING PARTICIPANTS TO OBTAIN DISCOUNTS ON PRESCRIPTION DRUGS; ADMINISTRATION OF DISCOUNT PRESCRIPTION DRUG CARD PROGRAM ENABLING PARTICIPANTS TO OBTAIN DISCOUNTS ON PRESCRIPTION DRUG AT LOCAL PHARMACIES;ADMINISTRATION OF A PRESCRIPTION DRUG DISCOUNT PROGRAM IN THE NATURE OF ISSUING DISCOUNT PRESCRIPTION DRUG CARDS TO PARTICIPANTS AND MONITORING USE THEREOF; ADMINISTRATION OF A PRESCRIPTION DRUG DISCOUNT CARD PROGRAM OFFERED IN CONNECTION WITH EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS; DISCOUNT PRESCRIPTION DRUG PROGRAM FOR PROVIDING DISCOUNTS FOR PRESCRIPTION AND NON-PRESCRIPTION DRUGS, NAMELY, ADMINISTRATION OF A CARD PROGRAM ALLOWING CONSUMERS TO OBTAIN DISCOUNTS ON PRESCRIPTION DRUGS THROUGH THE USE OF A DISCOUNT CARD; PRESCRIPTION DRUG DISCOUNT SERVICES, NAMELY, ADMINISTRATION OF A CARD PROGRAM ALLOWING CONSUMERS TO OBTAIN DISCOUNTS ON PRESCRIPTION AND NON-PRESCRIPTION DRUGS THROUGH THE USE OF A DISCOUNT CARD | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROBBINS, JAMES D.
- Other trademarks owned by ROBBINS, SUSAN M.
- Other trademarks owned by ROBBINS, SUSAN M.
- Other trademarks owned by ROBBINS, JAMES D.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named APOTHECARD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |