USPTO serial 77056043
BOOMER MARKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3379751Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 5, 2008
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BOOMER MARKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRADLEY SNIDERMAN
BRADLEY SNIDERMAN THE LAW OFFICE OF BRADELY M. SNIDERMAN23679 CALABASAS RD.#558CALABASAS, CA 91302Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computer services, namely, providing a website over the Internet for the dissemination of consumer information and related news about products and services based on the social, lifestyle, economic and legal needs pertaining to the Baby Boorner generation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |