USPTO serial 77056208
BOB LONG DIRECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOB LONG DIRECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terence J. Linn
TERENCE J LINN VAN DYKE, GARDNER, LINN & BURKHART LLPPO BOX 8886952851 CHARLEVOIX DR SE STE 207GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49588-8695Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Paintball equipment, namely, paintball marker guns, gun barrels, barrel adaptors, sites, triggers, frames, stocks, firing mechanisms, vertical feeds, power feed adaptors, feed elbows, grips, air regulators, actuator rods, shafts, expansion chambers, velocity adjusters, valves, valve pins, drop forwards, paintballs, paintball inks and projectiles sold as a unit, ammunition pods and carrying packs therefore, paintball pads, face masks, knee pads, chest pads, hip pads, gloves, marker flags, and barriers and obstacles in the nature of large objects for players to hide behind | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring paintball equipment; on-line retail store services featuring paintball equipment; mail order services featuring paintball equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |