Drawing for RUBY POMEGRANATE HARMONY

USPTO serial 77057416

RUBY POMEGRANATE HARMONY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUBY POMEGRANATE HARMONY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marshall J. Nelson

MARSHALL J. NELSON DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1201 THIRD AVESUITE 2200SEATTLE, WA 98101-3045

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032blended juices of vegetables, fruits and pomegranate fruitsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2008MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 20, 2008ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 19, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 7, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 4, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance