USPTO serial 77057941
NIKITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, JANET H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NIKITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. Douglas Hahm
Ray Thomas, Jr. Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P.1030 15th Street NWSuite 400 EastWashington, DC 20005-1503Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Liquid soap, shower gel; perfumery; essential oils; cosmetics; skin care products, namely, deodorants, non-medicated skin serum, body lotion, body cream, facial creams, sun block preparation, after sun lotions, facial wash, facial cleansers, hand cream, body scrub; hair care products, namely, hair care lotions, shampoo, conditioner, hair treatment preparations, mask, lotion, wax, mud, clay, gel, aerosol hair spray, non-aerosol hair spray, aerosol mousse, paste, sea spray in the nature of hair styling and conditioning spray | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Paper and paper goods, namely, paper bags, napkins of paper for removing makeup, posters; cardboard and cardboard goods, namely, cardboard containers, cardboard boxes; books in the field of hairdressing, hair care and skin care; photographs; printed instructional and teaching material in the field of hairdressing, hair care and skin care; plastic material for packaging, namely, plastic bags for packaging of hair products and skin care products | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Hair combs; cleaning sponges and bath sponges; cosmetic brushes; articles for cleaning purposes, namely, pre-moistened towelettes for cleaning, cleaning mitts of fabric | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Hair products, namely, hair bands, hair extensions, hair pins, hair curlers, hair curling pins, false hair, hair grips, hair nets, hair ornaments | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions; demonstration of goods; import-export agencies; modeling for advertising or sales promotion; sale promotion for others, namely, sales promotion for hair products and skin products | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing seminars and classes in the field of hairdressing; providing of training services in the field of hairdressing, hair products and skin products; organizing community sporting and cultural activities | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Hairdressing salons; beauty salons; health spa services, namely, cosmetic body care services, manicure, pedicure | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nikita Gruppen AS
- Other trademarks owned by Nikita Gruppen AS
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named NIKITA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |